labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone

labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone

Blog Article

seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal to the deceased was caused with the petitioner but in support of opinion with the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable within the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is just not binding within the Court.

maintaining the conviction awarded towards the appellant reduce the sentence of your appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It is far from from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

4.       It goes without expressing that observations made hereinabove are just tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of instantaneous bail petition.

Free case regulation sites in Pakistan are a must have resources for anybody needing to understand Pakistani regulation. By making use of the information and techniques outlined in this article, you may navigate these resources effectively and conduct extensive legal research.

Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

2. I have read the figured out counsel for that parties and also uncovered DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-

Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (three), has long been setting a precedent which allows for much less difficult access on the public to approach the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

three. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and making sure that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

                                                        

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields check here have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Development, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.